🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as something of a local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and most voters favored Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots added after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, where the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. However Mamdani gained half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I figured it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That really was unexpected. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a high participation. I believe occurred significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. Thus there was a little resistance. However overall, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they favored Cuomo. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – people will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.